Probably a very sexist reversal, where “her” is the no underwear fem, and “me” is the lazy douche. I imagine the red lacy number is added in as well on the right side.
Looked up for original using tineye and google images and the result is that the only thing changed in here is the “her” and “me” text reversal. Original still has red lace on the right (the “me”) side.
However, I did see some variations that instead of lace there were uhhh… let’s just say suspiciously shaped knitted warmers.
I’m really curious what the original said tho
Probably a very sexist reversal, where “her” is the no underwear fem, and “me” is the lazy douche. I imagine the red lacy number is added in as well on the right side.
Looked up for original using tineye and google images and the result is that the only thing changed in here is the “her” and “me” text reversal. Original still has red lace on the right (the “me”) side.
However, I did see some variations that instead of lace there were uhhh… let’s just say suspiciously shaped knitted warmers.
Likely how society wants me to dress versus how I want to dress
me and her is reversed, that’s all